Should the Policy Be Informative or Strict in Terms of Enforcement¶

Questions or comments?

Post them as a comment on the tracking issue -- requires a GitHub account with access to this repo.

Note

Following information is reverse engineered for [AI-DLC]. Review and remove this note before proceeding.

GitHub Issue Description (verbatim)¶

Issue #62, titled "[CoreHCM]Should the policy be informative or strict in terms of enforcement" (parent: #328 "[Other Work] Core HR Tech Debt"):

(issue body is empty — title is the only content)

This issue's title is nearly identical to Feature 6 in scratch-pad/q3-prds/Nova_Core_HCM_known_Enhancements.docx, verbatim:

Feature 6: Should the policy be informative or strict in terms of enforcement — At present, the policy is informative only. Provide an ability to configure whether policy should be strict or informative at transaction configuration level.

Stated as a possible match, not a confirmed one — this issue's own body gives no content to confirm against, and this PRD is already flagged elsewhere (see specs-corehr/feature-sets/critical-core-hr-transactions/concept.md's Related PRDs discussion) as overlapping with other Core HR work rather than being cleanly scoped to this one issue.

Sources¶

GitHub issue #62
Possible match: Nova_Core_HCM_known_Enhancements.docx, Feature 6 (not confirmed)

Should the Policy Be Informative or Strict in Terms of Enforcement¶

GitHub Issue Description (verbatim)¶

Possible related PRD content (not confirmed as the same item)¶

Sources¶